- Special Sections
- Time Out
By MARTHA SMITH
Special to the Standard
EXETER â€“ The firestorm of controversy that engulfed the Exeter Animal Shelter in late April â€“ and seemed doused by May 24 when an ordinance was adopted placing the facility under the director of public works â€“ has been smoldering all along.
In a remarkable turn of events, the council held a special meeting last Wednesday in the library of the Exeter-West Greenwich Junior-Senior High School to hear complaints from Jutta Lucas, the animal control officer at the center of last springâ€™s brouhaha.
During the summer she aired her views on a TV news broadcast before rising at the Sept. 4 council meeting to renew claims of shelter mismanagement.
â€śThis meeting,â€ť said council president Arlene Hicks last week â€śis the result of remarks at the Sept. 4 meeting. We had no [advance] knowledge; those issues werenâ€™t on the agenda.â€ť
She noted that the protocol for dealing with such matters is for an employee to first approach his or her supervisor and then the town manager â€“ which Exeter doesnâ€™t have. â€śIt is unusual to hold this type of special meeting.â€ť
A union official sat behind her as Lucas shared a front table with her boyfriend Richard M. Seymour, a local waste hauler. She consulted a laptop computer to make assertions such as:
n The shelter is not running according to policy and procedures
n Adoption fees are outdated and the shelterâ€™s hours of
operation benefit personnel rather than the public
n Dogs are â€śat risk,â€ť need better outdoor runs and despite her requests that trainers be brought in to socialize dogs that tend to be aggressive, â€śnothing has been done.â€ť
n Adoption decisions are biased, â€śunderhand activitiesâ€ť are occurring and the director issued a letter declaring his ability to have final say on adoptions. (Although Hicks admonished speakers not to name anyone, it was clear Lucas meant Steve Mattscheck, with whom she has an acrimonious relationship.)
n The number of cats at the shelter must be reduced to 15 or the rest will be euthanized; dogs dropped on the doorstep are under similar threat.
n She has been reprimanded and told to keep her opinions to herself despite her great knowledge.
n Shelter management has told staff , â€śWe donâ€™t care about animals once they leaveâ€ť leading to sick animals being adopted out.
His voice raised, council vice president Bill Monahan asked, â€śHow many cats have been euthanized?â€ť
â€śNone,â€ť replied Lucas.
â€śHow many dogs and cats have been euthanized after being dropped at the door?â€ť Monahan continued.
â€śNobodyâ€™s dropping them,â€ť Lucas said.
â€śWhy are you accusing us?â€ť demanded Monahan.
Lucas then began shouting at the council â€“ which had steadfastly defended her against angry crowds last spring â€“ charging, â€śYou hung me out to dry. You stabbed me in the back. I give more than 100 percent every day.â€ť
A clearly-affronted Hicks, who earlier went on record as Lucasâ€™ staunchest supporter, asked, â€śHow did this council stab you in the back?â€ť
Lucas reminded the council that sheâ€™d â€ścome in and cleaned up your messâ€ť at the shelter and had been betrayed.
Ray Morrissey, council liaison to the shelter, offered an emotional apology to Lucas during which he seemed near tears.
â€śMiss Lucas did a wonderful job [as ACO in charge.] I went on vacationâ€ť and a director was voted in. â€śI feel that people are trying to get rid of you, throw you under the bus. I want to apologize to you. Things are reverting back [to previous shelter conditions] and I donâ€™t like it. This style of management isnâ€™t working.â€ť
Councilman Calvin Ellis found the adoption fee schedule information confusing. â€śI feel the picture is distorted. Is there a fee schedule? No fee schedule?â€ť
Despite her suggestions about increasing fees, Lucas said nothing had been done.
When her testimony ended, the public was dismissed so the council could go into executive session and hear Mattscheckâ€™s position. Although participants are not allowed to discuss what goes on in these sessions, the director said later it was a matter of one personâ€™s biased viewpoint versus another personâ€™s biased viewpoint.
Ultimately, he added, â€śNothing happened.â€ť
In an interview later, Ellis said of the continued shelter problems that heâ€™s â€śpretty disappointed. Itâ€™s discouraging. Arlene has spent so much time since all of this surfaced at the shelter, trying to wok out quirks and personality clashes. We have to addressâ€ť the issue.
He said an e-mail circulated by Seymour in which he once again levels charges of fraud and theft at the shelter, mocks the councilâ€™s behavior at the special meeting and refers to them with an obscene word is â€śnot a good thing. Hostile e-mails arenâ€™t credible and I take them with a grain of salt.â€ť
Morrisseyâ€™s comments and those of Dan Patterson â€“ who has clashed with Mattscheck in the past â€“ may have backfired. At least one prominent Republican no longer supports the two and is speaking out about their behavior.
Carla Neubert Benoist, who sits on the planning and library boards and is a member of the GOP town committee, said, â€śBoth of these men are simply showing a lack of intelligence, judgment and character.â€ť
Noting that she â€śdoesnâ€™t relishâ€ť going against people in her own party, Benoist explained â€śI believe that holding public office is a sacred trustâ€ť and recent actions by the two men show â€śa huge lack of character. I donâ€™t care what party they say they represent, their first duty is to the people who elected them.â€ť
Sheâ€™s especially baffled by Morrisseyâ€™s criticism of the shelterâ€™s management since she recalled a conversation in which he contended that appointing Mattscheck â€śhad been his idea. At the time, I questioned the strategy but over the following weeks and months I could see that it was workingâ€ť and Mattscheck was bringing professionalism and compassion to the job.
â€śI can only conclude that Ray was grandstanding to get votes,â€ť she said of Morrissey, who runs as an Independent but attends GOP events and aligns himself with Patterson in council matters. â€śAfter bragging about the idea of putting Steven in charge, why would he turn around and grovel and think he was impressing voters in a way that would make them want to vote for him?â€ť
Benoist said she expects â€śat the leastâ€ť to be asked to leave the town committee, adding that sheâ€™s so offended by whatâ€™s going on she doesnâ€™t really care.
Martha Smith is an award-winning journalist and author. Retired, she is a freelance writer for SRIN.
.Â Â Â